Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melaina Shipwash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melaina Shipwash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shipwash is only marginally notable for being Miss Colorado. However being miss anystate is not enough on its own to establish notability. There is no coverage of her beyond this, and the coverage of her for this is largely confined to Colorado Springs and not to the larger media market of Denver let alone notice beyond the borders of Colorado. John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This discussion was originally closed as no consensus because there is a lack of Wikipedia consensus on the matter on December 6th, after I presented some issues to the closer, and another editor argued that these should be considered on a case by case basis, the administrator who closed gave permission to reopen this discussion. I primarily state this so the time frame when this discussion has actually been open can be clearly seen. It was closed from early December 6th (about 7 GMT) to about 14 GMT on December 9th.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been relisted in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions now that it has been reopened.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- run-of-the-mill state level pageant winner; in the absence of other notability factors, such pages are routinely deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Another pageant winner who is not notable. -- Dane ^talk 00:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Being a beauty pageant winner is not enough in itself to prove notability.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.